Review Management System
Review Management System
The Review Management System (RMS) is designed to streamline the manuscript submission, peer review, editorial decision-making, and publication process It ensures a standardized, ethical, and efficient peer review process, enabling high-quality publications across Journals, Books, and Conference Proceedings published by Jack Sparrow Publishers. It ensures transparency, quality, and efficiency in scholarly communication. It ensures a standardized, ethical, and efficient peer review process, enabling high-quality publications across journals, books, and conference proceedings. The Double-Blind Peer Review process at Jack Sparrow Publishers upholds academic fairness, integrity, and excellence, ensuring that every manuscript is judged solely on its scholarly merit.
Ensure high-quality peer review through systematic workflows.
Maintain anonymity (double-blind review) to reduce bias.
Provide timely feedback to authors and editors.
(a) Manuscript Submission
Authors upload manuscripts via the online submission portal.
System checks for:
Format compliance
Automated notifications (submission, review invitations, reminders, decisions).
Reviewer database with performance tracking.
Plagiarism detection integration (Turnitin/iThenticate).
Authors: Submit manuscripts, respond to reviews, track progress.
Editors: Assign reviewers, oversee review process, make decisions.
Reviewers: Evaluate manuscripts, provide feedback, recommend outcomes.
COPE Guidelines compliance for ethical publishing.
Conflict of Interest Declarations from authors and reviewers.
Data confidentiality maintained throughout the process.
Improves efficiency by reducing manual handling.
Ensures fairness and objectivity in reviews.
Enhances author satisfaction with timely decisions.
Builds a global reviewer network.
